Of medieval Arab chroniclers is now at the very forefront of historical debate. Have been a few commendable efforts to correct this. Scholarship has rarely strayed from its Eurocentric lens, but in the last decade there Perpetuating a western narrative of the so-called “conquest of the Holy Land”. When we considerĪll accounts, we uncover a more comprehensive and significant version of the events.ĭifferences in perspective between east and west continue to this day and, after theĮvents of 9/11, it is more important than ever to be openminded and considerate toĬountless books about the First Crusade have been produced in the English language, On seemingly more pressing matters, such as famine and civil war. There is recognition of “Franks” entering the Levant in the late 1090s,īut the chroniclers had little to say about them. According to medieval Arab chronicles, there is no event known as theįirst Crusade. Read like an epic tale of good triumphing over evil, but this is merely one version Western scholarsĪnd historians, from the 11 thcentury through today, seem particularly interested in the First Crusade. The crusades are a popular topic in the field of medieval history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |